Performance and Emission Analysis of an Energy System Based on a Thermochemical Process and a Proton-Conducting Electrolyte Fuel Cell

Document Type : Article

Author

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology, Kermanshah, Iran

10.24200/j40.2025.67629.1751

Abstract

The growing need for clean energy and effective waste management highlights the importance of integrated systems like waste gasification combined with fuel cells, offering a sustainable solution to reduce emissions and convert waste into useful energy. This study presents a sustainable energy system based on a proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell, in which the required fuel is supplied by gasifying municipal solid waste. The main goals are to maximize the net power output and minimize carbon dioxide emissions. The performance of the system was evaluated under varying operating conditions, including current density, inlet temperature, and fuel utilization ratio. A thermodynamic model of the system was developed using an engineering equation solver, and its accuracy was validated by comparing the results with data from previous studies. The comparison showed good agreement, confirming the reliability of the model. To further analyze the system, machine learning techniques were used to create regression models that predict the outputs based on the input parameters. These models helped examine the combined influence of the operational variables and supported a multi-objective optimization approach. The optimization results showed that higher current densities generally lead to increased power output. At high current densities, increasing the inlet temperature significantly raises carbon dioxide emissions, which may rise from about 1085 kg/MWh to nearly 4468 kg/MWh. In contrast, when the system operates at current densities below 3500 A/m2, carbon dioxide emissions remain in a lower and more stable range (between 500 and 800 kg/MWh), regardless of the fuel utilization ratio. The optimal operating point for the system was found at a current density of 5798 A/m2, an inlet temperature of 800 °C, and a fuel utilization ratio of 0.80. Under these conditions, the system generates a net power output of 315.3 kW, while emitting 1001 kg of carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour of electricity produced.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Ren B. Chi Y. Zhou N. Wang Q. Wang T. Luo Y. Ye J. and Zhu X. 2024. Machine learning applications in health monitoring of renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, pp. 114039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114039.
2. Sadeghi A. D‌a‌v‌o‌u‌d‌a‌b‌a‌d‌i F‌a‌r‌a‌h‌a‌n‌i S. 2019. Thermodynamic and economic optimization of the refrigeration system in a building, Sharif Journal of Mechanical Engineering (SJME), 3(2), pp. 107-116. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.24200/j40.2018.51548.1474.
3. Wang W. Zhou X. Tian G. Fathollahi-Fard A. M. Wu P. Zhang C. Liu C. Li Z. 2022. Multi-objective low-carbon hybrid flow shop scheduling via an improved teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm, Scientia Iranica, pp. -. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2022.58317.5665.
4. Roy Keramati M. Shariatmadari N. Karimpour-Fard, M. Saeedanezhad A. Alidoust P. 2019. Effect of aging on dynamic properties of municipal solid waste: A case study of Kahrizak Landfill, Tehran, Iran, Scientia Iranica, 26(3), pp. 1077-1088. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2017.4594.
5. Biancini G. Cioccolanti L. Moradi R. and Moglie M. 2024. Comparative study of steam, organic Rankine cycle and supercritical CO2 power plants integrated with residual municipal solid waste gasification for district heating and cooling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 241, pp.122437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122437.
6. Fakhim-Ghanbarzadeh B. Fani M. Farhanieh B. 2011. Exergoeconomic optimization of combined heat and power system incorporating fluidized bed gasifier, Sharif Journal of Mechanical Engineering (SJME), 3(2), pp. 3-13. [In Persian]
7. Hu Z. Gao P. Wang B. Pan W. Ding L. Tang L. Chen X. and Wang F. 2024. Decoupling study of municipal solid waste gasification: effect of pelletization on pyrolysis and gasification of pyrolytic char. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12(6), 114334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.114334.
8. Mojaver P. Chitsaz A. Sadeghi M. and Khalilarya S. 2020. Comprehensive comparison of SOFCs with proton-conducting electrolyte and oxygen ion-conducting electrolyte: thermoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization. Energy Conversion and Management, 205, pp.112455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112455.
9. Kumuk B. Atak N. N. Dogan B. Yesilyurt M. K. 2025. A comprehensive investigation on the enhancing the thermal efficiency of solid oxide fuel cells through temperature and pore diameter optimization, Scientia Iranica, pp. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2025.65609.9576.
10. Gao B. and Zhou Y. 2025. Multi-objective optimization and posteriori multi-criteria decision making on an integrative solid oxide fuel cell cooling, heating and power system with semi-empirical model-driven co-simulation. Energy Conversion and Management, 325, pp.119371.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119371.
11. Yue M. Zhang Y. Lv L. Zhu J. Fu Y. and Ye F. 2026. A novel biomass microwave-assisted pyrolysis system driven by solid oxide fuel cell: modeling and energy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 348, pp.120680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120680.
12. Ghorbani B. Zendehboudi S. Afrouzi Z.A. and Mohammadzadeh, O. 2024. Efficient hydrogen production via electro-thermochemical process and solid oxide fuel cell: thermodynamics, economics, optimization, and uncertainty analyses. Energy Conversion and Management, 307, pp.118175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118175.
13. Li J. Yu T. and Yang B. 2021. A data-driven output voltage control of solid oxide fuel cell using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Applied Energy, 304, pp.117541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117541.
14. Wang Y. Wu C. Zhao S. Wang J. Zu B. Han M. Du Q. Ni M. and Jiao K. 2022. Coupling deep learning and multi-objective genetic algorithms to achieve high performance and durability of direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell. Applied energy, 315, pp.119046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119046.
15. Khalilarya S. Chitsaz A. and Mojaver P. 2021. Optimization of a combined heat and power system based gasification of municipal solid waste of Urmia university student dormitories via ANOVA and taguchi approaches. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(2), pp.1815-1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.020.
16. Mojaver P. Khalilarya S. and Chitsaz A. 2019. Multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology and exergy analysis of a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 156, pp.627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.104.
17. Razmi A.R. Sharifi S. Vafaeenezhad S. Hanifi A.R. and Shahbakhti M. 2024. Modeling and microstructural study of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells: experimental and thermodynamic analyses. International journal of hydrogen energy, 54, pp.613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.296.
18. Mojaver P. Khalilarya S. and Chitsaz A. 2018. Performance assessment of a combined heat and power system: a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system part I: thermodynamic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 171, pp.287-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.096.
19. Loha C. Chattopadhyay H. and Chatterjee P.K. 2011. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk. Energy, 36(7), pp.4063-4071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.042.
20. Ranjbar F. Chitsaz A. Mahmoudi S.S. Khalilarya S. and Rosen M.A. 2014. Energy and exergy assessments of a novel trigeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management, 87, pp.318-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.014.
21. Mojaver P. Khalilarya S. and Chitsaz A. 2019. Multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology and exergy analysis of a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 156, pp.627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.014.
22. Mojaver P. Abbasalizadeh M. Khalilarya S. and Chitsaz A. 2020. Co-generation of electricity and heating using a SOFC-ScCO2 Brayton cycle-ORC integrated plant: investigation and multi-objective optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(51), pp.27713-27729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.137.
23. Mojaver P. Khalilarya S. and Chitsaz A., 2021. Combined systems based on OSOFC/HSOFC: Comparative analysis and multi‐objective optimization of power and emission. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(4), pp.5449-5469. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6173.
Sharif Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Volume 41, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
February 2026
Pages 127-135

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics